2018 (3) TMI 832

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Kumar Tripathi (AC) AR, for Respondent Per: Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order, we find that the demand on duty has been confirmed on their activity. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Corrugated Boxes on their home and in some cases they are doing job work on behalf of principal manufacturer. The case of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder taken by the appellant amounts to manufacture but their job work activity they were paying service tax and same has been accepted by the Revenue. It is also accepted by the Revenue. It is also submitted by him that period cannot take place and never raise any objection for paying service tax by the appellant instead of duty. In that circumstances demands are not sustainable. He also submitted....