Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ingh, AR - for the Respondent ORDER Per: Ms. Archana Wadhwa After hearing both the sides, I find that the appellant sold old and used capital goods to one M/s. Saturn Steel Ventures and Advisors P Ltd. in terms of Memorandum of Understanding entered between the appellant and the purchasers. The goods were sold under Invoice No.0012040867 dated 30.9.2012 and duty of Rs. 6,14,122/- was paid on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 4. The lower authorities have observed that the appellant has not produced any evidence on record to show that capital goods sold by them were out of non-cenvatable capital goods except an affidavit to that effect. The original adjudicating authority held that one of the capital goods removed by the assessee is billet heating furnace Inductotherm, which is of the year 2003. This fact refutes the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....able capital goods. Admittedly, the appellants have not placed any evidence on record to show that such capital goods were purchased by them before 1991 and no cenvat credit has been availed by them. It is well established principal of law that onus to establish that capital goods were purchased after introduction of cenvat credit, is on the assessee, who is claiming the benefit. The only evidence....