2018 (3) TMI 588

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Respondent. P.C: This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges the order dated 5.3.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order dated 5.3.2015 is in respect of Assessment Year 2009-10. 2 Revenue urges the following question of law, for our consideration: "(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Tribunal has upheld the order of the CIT (A) which had in turn followed its own order in respect of Respondent-Assessee for the Assessment Year 2008-09. It is submitted by Mr. Suresh Kumar that Revenue's Appeal for the Assessment Year 2008-09 was allowed by Tribunal by the order dated 11.10.2013 and the issue was restored to the CIT (A) for fresh consideration. Therefore, it is subm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Assessing Officer. This is the only ground canvassed in respect of the question as proposed by the Revenue. 5. We find that in the impugned order dated 5.3.2015, no grievance has been made by the Revenue before the Tribunal of the order dated 15.2.2013 was passed by relying upon evidence which was not made available to the Assessing Officer as in the case of the order of the CIT(A) for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sment Year, the Respondent-Assessee has kept necessary percentage of bed reserved for needy and poor people and necessary percentage of the gross revenue was transferred to Indigent Patients Fund. It is only after having reached an independent conclusion for the subject Assessment Year that the Respondent is entitled to Section 11 of the Act, does it further record that in the Appellant's own ....