2018 (3) TMI 532
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ameer Dalal, Advocate for the respondent ORDER P. C. 1. This application seeks condonation of 632 days delay in taking out this application to set aside the selfoperating order dated 14th January, 2016 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master rejecting the petitioner's appeal for failure to remove office objections in terms of Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side), Rul....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e, then, we expect the Revenue to appoint and depute responsible officials and to follow up the legal cases and matters in this Court. The officers cannot pass on the buck to some junior level employees or clerical staff. This is routinely happening inasmuch as the Departmental heads have not been attending the cases by taking a periodical review of the proceedings or appeals lodged in this Court.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d in the earlier order but this Court has refused to uphold it after it was noticed that this is the position in almost every matter. 9. This is no explanation for the delay of 1371 days and if for all these years the Revenue officials have not noticed the lodging, filing or pendency of an appeal, a conditional order of the Registry, then, it must set its own house in order by sacking and....
TaxTMI