2009 (10) TMI 962

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri S.P. Seth, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri K. Lal, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER This application filed by the appellant states that there is an error apparent from the records in final-order No. A/158/2009/SMB/C-IV dated 6-4-2009 passed by this Bench in appeal No. E/386/2008 [2009 (241) E.L.T. 474 (Tribunal)]. It is submitted that the following contentions of the appellant remain....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iven with regard to the penalty imposed on the appellant or the interest sought to be levied from them. According to the appellant, what they consider as non-consideration of their pleas amounts to an error apparent from the records. According to them, the final-order requires to be recalled. The counsel has reiterated the above submissions. The learned DR opposes this application. He submits that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld necessarily satisfy the legal requirements embodied in the main part of the definition. Therefore, the present grievance raised by the appellant is bereft of bona fides. Yet another grievance raised by the appellant is that they were statutorily required to maintain greenery on 33% of the factory premises, but this aspect was not considered. The above aspect turned out to be irrelevant in a sit....