Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 1468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../Bang/2012) relating to the Assessment Year 2007-08, raising the following substantial question of law: "Whether on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in confirming the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) in allowing the assessee's claim for written back of excess provision for bad and doubtful debts?" 2. The assessee-respondent is a Rural Regional Bank, governed by Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The Assessment was concluded under Section 143(3) of the Act by the assessing authority making certain additions to the return of income filed. Additions relating to the excess provision of bad and doubtful debts of Rs. 8,17,83,534/- is the issue involved in this appeal. The assessment order passe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ear under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Act. 5. We have given our anxious consideration to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and perused the material on record. 6. The Tribunal being last fact finding authority has categorically held that the excess provision of Rs. 8,17,83,534/- for bad and doubtful debts existed in the books was written back by the assessee; however, it is not the case of the revenue that the excess provision written back in the profit and loss account had also been allowed as deduction in the past assessment of total income of the assessee. With these factual findings, what can be inferred is that no material was placed on record to establish the fact that the excess pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hall be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of that previous year, whether the business or profession in respect of which the allowance or deduction has been made is in existence in that year or not. 8. A conjoint reading of these provisions contemplates that if an allowance or deduction has been made in the assessment for any year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability and the same is written back in the books of accounts, the said written back expenditure, loss or trading liability shall be eligible to levy of tax as income. The burden lies on the Revenue to prove that the provision for bad and doubtful debts written back was allowed as expenditur....