Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (2) TMI 936

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the technical knowhow expenditure (technical assistance fees) is revenue expenditure ignoring the fact that as per amended provisions of Section 32, technical knowhow is an intangible asset and the fee for obtaining the same is a capital expenditure and not revenue expenditure? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the profit of US and UK branches is not taxable in India and should be excluded from the taxable profit of the assessee? (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in resto....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....admission, obtained from his client, a copy of the order dated 29th July, 2015 passed by the Assessing Officer giving effect to the impugned order dated 22nd October, 2014 on this issue. In support, he tenders a copy of the same across the bar. 5. On examination of the order dated 29th July, 2015, we enquired of Mr. Chhotaray as to why we were informed that no order consequent to the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 22nd October, 2014 has been passed by the Assessing Officer on this issue. Mr. Chhotaray again informs us that the Assessing Officer, who has instructed him in this matter, met him twice and had specifically told him that no order has been passed consequent to the impugned order dated 22nd October, 2014 of the Tribunal in r....