2018 (2) TMI 1398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er: Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein demand of Rs. 3,92,916/- has been confirmed under Explanation 1 to Rule 6 (1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 along with penalty.  2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacturer of poly films. To manufacture poly films, the appellant required plastic granules and certain chemicals in barrel. Aft....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plicable to the facts of the case. He also took the support of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CCE Vs. West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. - 2003 (155) ELT 11 (SC). 4. On the other hand, ld. DR supported the impugned order and submits that the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. (supra) is not applicable to the facts of this case....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... denied to job worker referred to in rule 12AA of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, on the ground that the said inputs are used in the manufacture of goods cleared without payment of duty under the provisions of that rule." 7. The provision of Rule 6 are applicable where the assessee is manufacturing dutiable as well as exempted goods. The appellant is not manufacturing these bags or barrels, the....