Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 852

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der passed by the second appellant has been quashed. The appellants have been directed to calculate the amount of drawback available to the respondent in respect of the goods exported by them. The writ petition was filed in the following circumstances : 2. The respondent is engaged in the manufacture and export of insulated copper strips and rectangular paper covered conductors. According to the respondent, the two raw materials that go into the manufacture of the above products are insulation paper and copper. The insulation paper required for their manufacture is imported by the respondent. However, the second ingredient copper that goes into the manufacture of their products is procured indigenously from local producers. Since the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rawback, under Rule 6 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules' for short). The second respondent considered the contentions of the respondent and by Ext. P9 order, held that they were not entitled to any drawback, as claimed by them. It was aggrieved by Ext. P9 that the respondent had filed the writ petition. 3. The writ petition was contested by the appellants. A counter affidavit was filed taking up a contention that, the respondent had not imported copper or paid any customs duty. They had procured copper in the indigenous market after paying excise duty. They have got credit for the duty paid by them under the Cenvat Credit Rules. Inasmuch as no customs duty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er strips and rectangular paper covered conductors, for the production of which copper rods are used as raw material. According to the learned counsel, copper imported in its raw form or concentrated copper or as copper scrap are converted into copper rods that come in rolls. The said manufacturing process is undertaken by other manufacturers from whom the copper rods are purchased by the respondent. It is the contention of the learned counsel that, the process undertaken by the respondent is merely to reduce such copper rods to the specifications insisted upon by their customers and to insulate them by either using paper or other materials. Inasmuch as copper rods themselves are manufactured products, it is pointed out that copper is not o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t answer the all industry rates under Rule 3 of the Rules, they had approached the second respondent for having the rate of their drawback fixed under Rule 6 of the Rules. However, the second appellant by Ext. P9 held that the respondent was not entitled to claim drawback at all. According to the learned counsel for the respondent, the Cenvat credit availed by them represents only the additional customs duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, whereas the drawback claimed by them is in respect of the basic customs duty leviable under Section 2 of the said Act, to which they are entitled in view of the concept of deemed import introduced by Ext. P7. Therefore, Ext. P9 has, according to the learned counsel, been rightly interfered with....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stoms Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares that the whole of the material specified in the Table annexed hereto as is contained in the goods manufactured in India and exported outside India shall, for the purpose of sub-section (1) of the said Section 75, be deemed to be imported material."                       (emphasis supplied) What has been declared by Ext. P7 notification is that, "the whole of the material specified in the table annexed hereto as is contained in the goods manufactured in India and exported outside India" shall be deemed to be imported material. Therefore, the deeming provision is i....