2018 (2) TMI 849

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appellant. Rep. by Shri P. Juneja, AR for the respondent. ORDER Per: B. Ravichandran Today, the cross objection filed by the Revenue and misc. application for condonation of delay in filing such cross objection are listed. 2. Ld. AR for the Revenue submitted that the cross objection, filed after 5 days delay, is only comments on the appeal by the appellant and no additional or spe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....w Delhi. The investigating officers reported the gist of the fact along with role of the appellant to the Commissioner of Customs (General) through their letter dated 31.05.2016. Thereafter, the same was followed-up by letter dated 15.07.2016 addressed to the Superintendent (Policy) in the office of the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Customs House, New Delhi and letter dated 7.10.2016 addr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ordered on 10.06.2016 based on the preliminary offence report dated 31.05.2016 given by the Investigating Officer to the licensing authority. Thereafter, follow-up letters were issued by the investigating officers. Since the suspension is ordered based on the information of violation of CBLR by the appellant, the same should be considered as an offence report and the time limit, as prescribed und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... both the sides and perused the appeal record. 6. We consider the only adherence of time limit as per CBLR 2013 by the Licensing Authority. Admittedly, based on the preliminary offence report dated 31.05.2016, the licence of the appellant was suspended on 10.06.2016. It is apparent that such suspension can happen only on the receipt of the information regarding offence committed by the appellan....