Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2018 (2) TMI 718

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for Respondent/Revenue Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The above stated three appeals are arising out of common Order-in-Appeal No. 266-267-CE/GZB/2011 dated 31/03/2011 passed by Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), Ghaziabad. Therefore, they are taken together for decision. 2. The brief facts of the case are that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rer-appellants was called upon to show cause as to why the amount they were made to deposit should not be recovered under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and why the amount deposited should not be appropriated. Further, there was a proposal for imposition of penalty. On contest, the Show Cause Notice was adjudicated through Order-in-Original dated 31/08/2010 wherein demand was confirmed a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....there is no provisions in Central Excise Act and Rules made thereunder to retrospectively ask for consumption of individual raw-material or input in unit, final product manufactured and decide the admissibility of Cenvat credit on such criteria and that the entire Show Cause Notice is based on such methodology and manufacturer-appellants were force to deposit Rs. 38,08,379/- and such deposit was w....