2013 (12) TMI 1658

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ansali , Advocate, for the appellant Sri Saboorul Hasan Usmani, JCIT, Sr. D.R. for the respondent O R D E R Per Abraham P. Geroge : 1. In this appeal filed by the assessee, it assails penalty of Rs. 48,043/- levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "The Act"), which was confirmed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata. 2. Facts apropos a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year for filing return online, assessee could find no appropriate column for making a suo motu disallowance, resulting in the mistake. However, Assessing Officer was not impressed. According to him even during the course of assessment proceedings, assessee did not rectify the mistake. Assessee was held guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. A penalty of Rs. 48,043/- was levied und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, ld. DR supported the order of authorities below. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. What we find is that the Assessing Officer had himself accepted that non-addition of loss on sale of fixed assets of Rs. 1,42,729/-, suo motu by the assessee, was only a mistake. There is no dispute that it was the first year of E-filing of return. Therefore i....