Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IAN J.-The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following questions of law for our consideration: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to relief Under section 80HHC relying upon the Board's Circular No. 729, dated November 1, 1995, which was not applicable for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee has not seriously disputed the game. Accordingly, following the judgment of the Supreme Court in Stonecraft Enterprises v. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 131, as well as the judgment in T.C. No. 250 of 1998 dated November 19, 2002 (CIT v. Pooshya Exports P. Ltd. [2003] 262 ITR 417), the first question of law referred to us is answered in the negative, against the assessee and in favour of the Re....