2017 (1) TMI 1541
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gh Yadav, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. Suchitra Sharma, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : V. Padmanabhan, Member (T)]. - The present appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 762/2015, dated 1-9-2015, passed by the Commissioner Appeals (Customs) IGI Airport, New Delhi. The appellant imported "Rough Marble Blocks" classifiable under CTH 2515, which are restricted good....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Commissioner (Appeals), he upheld the order-in-original. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the present appeal has been filed. 2. With the above background, we have heard Shri Ranbir Singh Yadav, ld. Advocate for the appellant as well as Smt. Suchitra Sharma, ld. DR for the respondent. 3. The ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the goods stand disposed of by the Customs th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cts and circumstances of the present case. 6. It is noted that the imported goods have already been disposed of by Customs Authorities since the importer has failed to clear the same within a reasonable period of time. Since, the goods are no longer available, the same cannot also be redeemed by the appellant-importer. Consequently, there is no question of payment of redemption fine as wel....
TaxTMI