TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2003 (1) TMI 49
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te Government. Before the Assessing Officer, the assessee had claimed that it was agricultural land and so the capital gains arising on the transfer were not liable to tax under the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer did not accept that claim and he prepared to make the assessment of the capital gains at Rs. 13,33,987. In the assessee's appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the capital gains arising on the transfer of the land constituted income within the meaning of section 2(14) of the Act and so it was rightly brought to tax. Another contention that the assessee had raised before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was that the capital gains, if at all taxable, were to be assessed for the assessment year 1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pital asset for the assessment year 1986-87 even though Thrikkakara is not appearing in the second notification No. 9447/F issued on January 6, 1994?" We heard learned counsel for the assessee and learned counsel for the Revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee argued that the land vested in the Government under the Land Acquisition Act only after the award is passed. The award in this case was passed not in the assessment year 1985-86, but in the assessment year 1986-87. The question for consideration is when the property vested in the Government. An extent of land measuring 2.7929 hectares and situated in Thrikkakara South Village in Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, was acquired by the Government. The Government accorded sanct....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....overnment may, having regard to the extent of, and scope for, urbanisation of that area and other relevant considerations, specified in this behalf by notification. So far as the Land Acquisition Act is concerned, there are two methods for acquisition; one is by the ordinary mode and the other is by resorting to the urgency clause. In the ordinary mode, the notification is issued under section 4 whereby it is made known that a certain land is likely to be acquired for a public purpose. An opportunity was given to the owner of the land to file his objection to the acquisition. After considering the objections, if the Government wants to go ahead with the acquisition, then a declaration is issued under section 6. Thereafter, an award enquiry ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....upon vest absolutely in the Government free from all encumbrances. Thus, so far as the urgency clause is concerned, possession can be taken after section 9 notice and such land shall vest in the Government. In the ordinary mode, possession is taken only after the award is passed. The contention of learned counsel for the assessee is that the possession is not taken under the Land Acquisition Act and, hence, in this case the crucial date taken is when the award was passed. We do not agree with the contention of learned counsel for the assessee. Even under both clauses vesting takes place only after the possession is taken. Taking possession earlier cannot be taken advantage. A similar contention arose in the decision reported in Kerala St....