Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 542

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nst setting aside of demand of Rs. 8,62,863/- 2. The brief facts of the case are that M/s (KIWP)  are engaged in the manufacture of goods falling under chapter 72 & 84 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They had cleared various goods by treating them as Sugar Mill Machinary and paying duty @10% Adv. They were issued four show cause notices alleging that they have cleared parts of different machineries and not the complete machinery hence liable to pay duty @ 15% Adv. as the same  is not  complete Sugar Mill Machinery. The demands were confirmed by the adjudicating authority vide order dt. 28.01.97. M/s KIWP filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) contending that they do not desire to contest the d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ustainable as the clearance is of value of Rs. 13,40,000/- out of the sugar plant value of Rs. 8,95,75,000/- which is below 1.5% of the total value  hence the goods cleared by the Appellant does not fall under the category of complete machine. In case  of goods cleared to M/s Tatyasaheb Kore Warna SSK Ltd. the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that as the complete system is designed and fabricated according to the specifications and requirements in terms of order placed by the Customer and is not a standard item for sale in market, therefore the entire system has to be considered as an individual item. The customer has entrusted the work of replacement of complete cane un-loader with gear box and motor of existing cane u....