Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....004. As per the scheme of charging service tax on Custom House Agent services since 1997, the appellant was paying service tax in respect of turnkey jobs on 15% of the gross amount charged from the clients as per the Circular dated 6.6.1997 issued by CBEC. This circular was in vogue till the introduction of Service Tax Valuation Rules in 2006. For the services rendered during the disputed period, the department was of the view that the said Circular will not be applicable to the appellant inasmuch as they were raising bills in respect of some of the services rendered on behalf of their clients. In such cases, the appellant has raised a consolidated bill but individual item-wise work carried out for the clients appear therein. The department....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ibunal in the case of Aspinwall & Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mangalore: 2011 (21) STR 257 (Tri.-Bang.). He submitted that the same view is required to be taken for the period under the present dispute inasmuch as the Circular dated 6.6.1997 was in vogue until 19.4.2006. He finally submitted that the demand may be set aside since the applicable service tax has already been paid by the appellant. 4. The learned DR justified the impugned order. He submitted that the Circular of 1997 will not be applicable to the appellant during the disputed period. It is his submission that the Circular is applicable only in respect of turnkey contracts, in which the appellant recovers lump sum amounts from their customers for all the servi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inding on us. It is also to be noted that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Velji P.& Sons seems to have been accepted by the Government of India, which can be ascertained from the fact that the Government of India in Finance Act, 2010 expanded the scope of many existing services and one of them being Port services . The expansion of definition of Port services , which has been brought into play by the Finance Act, 2010, would seeks to include all services provided entirely within airport/port premises would fall under these services i.e. Port services and there is no pre-condition of any authorisation from the port authority for taxing the services. It is also seen from the Circulars issued by the Government of India....