Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (3) TMI 58

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that on the facts and circumstances of the case, expenditure of Rs. 1,00,917 and Rs. 52,940 incurred on the education of Sh. Pankaj Jain and Sh. Manish Jain was allowable as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and he further submitted that the orders of the Appellate Tribunal and the Assessing Officer have omitted to consider the relevant facts and have taken into c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sites as per the rules." It is also pointed out that: "Sh. Pankaj Jain is stated to have joined the company with effect from July, 1994, on a salary of Rs. 3,100 per month." It is required to be noted that the court is concerned with the assessment year 1993-94, i.e., year ending on March 31, 1993. Therefore, even if the claim is accepted, they did not join during the year ending March 31, 1....