Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 153

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the appellant have utilized credit less than 20% of the total tax liability. In other words, whether the short utilization of CENVAT Credit against the eligible 20% can be carried forward in the subsequent month and such carried forward amount can be utilized, which comes to more than 20% of the total tax liability in the subsequent month. 2. Shri Yash Parmar, learned C.A. appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that as regards the service provided to World Bank and International Finance Corporation, these organizations are part of the United Nations. In this regard, he referred to a website print out of the United Nations wherein the World Bank and International Finance Corporation have been listed as United Nation entities. It is his submission that since both these organizations are part of United Nations, service provided to these organizations is clearly exempted under Notification No. 16/2002-ST. He relies on the following judgments: - (a) CC&CE, Kanpur Vs. Jyoti Capsules - 2010 (261) ELT 469 (Tri-Del). (b) Global Energy Consulting Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCCE & Service Tax, Hyde-II - 2008 (11) STR 8 (Tri-Bang) (c) Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd. Vs. CST, Mumbai - 2012 (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that, he submits that Rule 6(3)(c) clearly provides the ceiling of 20% of the total tax payable in a month. Accordingly, even if the appellants have short utilized the Cenvat credit for the previous month against 20% ceiling, the short utilization of credit cannot be adjusted by availing credit more than 20% in the subsequent month. Therefore, the view taken by the lower authority on the issue is correct and legal. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. 5. As regards the issue of exemption in respect of service provided to World Bank and International Finance Corporation, we find that as per organization structure of United Nations, World Bank and International Finance Corporation are enlisted as United Nation's entities, therefore, it is clear that the World Bank and International Finance Corporation are part of the United Nation Organization. 5.1 The contention of the Revenue is that these two organizations are not listed in the schedule of Section 3 of the United Nations (Privileges and Immunities) Act, 1947. In this regard, for the ease of reference, Notification No. 16/2002-ST dated 2.8.2002 is reproduced below: - "Service Tax Services pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or Catering service and Mandap keeper service, we find that the Insurance Auxiliary service used for indemnification of the officials such as Directors, employees, who play key role in providing the output service. The mandap keeper service used for conducting interviews for hiring employees, therefore, it is directly related to the overall providing of output service. Outdoor catering service is provided to the employees and clients of the appellant and the cost of the outdoor catering is incurred by the appellant. Therefore, it qualifies as input service and the credit is admissible. The exclusion clause was introduced on 1.4.2011. In the present case, the period involved is prior to that date. Therefore, there is no dispute for allowing the credit on the aforesaid services. The issue of admissibility of CENVAT Credit is covered by the judgment cited by the appellant. 5.3 Regarding the issue whether the appellant can utilize the CENVAT Credit more than 20% of the tax payable in a particular month when in the earlier month the entire 20% credit was not utilized and the balance was carried forward and utilized in the subsequent month. In this regard, we are of the view that if in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vider opts not to maintain separate accounts of input service meant for consumption in relation to rendering of such output services which are chargeable to service tax as well as exempted services or non-taxable services, he shall be allowed to utilize service tax credit for payment of service tax on any output service only to the extent of an amount not exceeding thirty five percent of the amount of service tax payable on such output service." A careful reading of the above provisions show that when the service provider does not maintain a separate accounts of input service for taxable and non-taxable output service, there is a restriction on utilization of the credit. As per the above rule, the utilization is restricted to 35% of the amount of service tax payable on such output service. At any point of time, the service provider can arrive at his liability which is service tax payable on his output service. He should calculate 35% of his liability. From out of the accumulated credit, he has allowed to utilize up to 35%. There is no indication that the service tax credit accumulated during the earlier period would lapse. In other words, there is no question of lapse of the cred....