Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 1121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Crl.M.A.No.239/2018 1. By way of the present applications, petitioners Virendra Jain and Surender Kumar Jain, the two brothers seek regular bail in ECIR/01/DLZOII/2017 dated 11th February, 2017 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short 'PMLA'). 2. The above-noted complaint was lodged after an order dated 28th October, 2013 was passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs directing investigation by Serious Fraud Investigating Officer (in short 'SFIO') into affairs of the various companies. On the basis of the investigation report a Criminal Complaint No. 57463/2016 dated 29th November, 2016 was filed by SFIO against 31 accused persons including the two petitioners for violation of the provisions under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unted income through the set of companies controlled by the petitioners in guise of share subscription money at a huge premium to the tune of Rs.64.70 crores during the financial year 2008-09 with the help of a professional Chartered Accountant Rajesh Aggarwal. It is the case of prosecution that the petitioners received Rs.1,11,46,000/- as commission @1.80% on the total accommodation entries of Rs.64.70 crores. 6. As per the petitioners after the income tax raids were conducted at their residential and business premises on 14th September, 2010 an assessment order was passed by the Assessing Authority, Income Tax Department against M/s Jagat Projects Ltd. opining that the share capital and share premium received by M/s Jagat Projects Ltd. w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Income Tax (Appeals) that the money invested was by genuine share subscription they have been denied bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that the mandate of investigation by SFIO is only provisions of Companies Act and they cannot investigate penal offences. No scheduled offence having been found out there is no basis for a complaint under the provisions of PMLA. 8. Learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposing the bail applications contends that since the predicate offence in the present case is money laundering of the tainted property by a scheduled offence, that is, 420 IPC even if it is held that no commission was paid, the said finding of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) related to the assessme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....17 was registered on 11th February, 2017 under Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA the prosecution bases its case heavily on the findings of the Income Tax Assessing Officer vide Assessment Order dated 28th March, 2013, recording a finding that M/s Jagat Projects Ltd. had laundered its unaccounted income through a set of companies controlled by the petitioners in the guise of share subscription money at a huge premium to the tune of Rs.64.70 crores during the financial year 2008-09 with the help of professional Chartered Accountant Rajesh Aggarwal. As noted above the said finding of the Assessing officer has been set aside. 12. The second basis of the above noted complaint is the finding of SFIO in its investigation that eight companies were invo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....based on the alleged scheduled offence being Section 420 IPC and the maximum sentence that can be awarded to the petitioners for offence punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA is seven years imprisonment, being an offence in Paragraph-I of Part-A of the Schedule of offences. 14. In the decision reported as Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy (supra) the Supreme Court noted that while granting bail, the court has to keep in mind the nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tamp....