Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 1520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ESPONDENT :SRI.S.ARUN RAJ JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Tribunal cancelling penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) that was confirmed in first appeal. After hearing both sides and after going through the Tribunal's order, we are unable to sustain the order for the reason that they have not considered any of the facts or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nalty appeal. The Tribunal should have realised that the lower authorities are also familiar with the statutory provisions and when the penalty order is sustained by the first appellate authority, it was the duty of the Tribunal to bestow attention on the nature of addition sustained in assessment and to consider whether there is concealment within the meaning of Section 271(1)(c) in respect of ea....