2018 (1) TMI 996

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Sharad Mishra, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate Judgment on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Revenue in these appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common decision of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the Appeals before the Tribunal. 4. The Tribunal did not find way to interfere with the imposition of interest which is a statutory add on liability. The Tribunal also upheld the imposition of penalty of 50% and dismissed the appeals. 5. Hearing the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Revenue, we do not find any ground to interfere with that part of the impugned ....