2018 (1) TMI 877
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....heme-2018 (hereinafter referred to as 'CODS-2018 Scheme') and the provisions of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. 4. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the petition can be disposed of on a consideration of the aforesaid statutory provisions and the CODS-2018 Scheme floated by the respondent No.1. 5. With the consent of the parties, we have taken up the writ petition for consideration. 6. It appears that the writ petitioners are the Directors of Shiv Vani Buildwell Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'). It is the contention of the petitioners that the company was in active business and it had defaulted the statutory compliance under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ch, 2011 onwards before the respondent No.2. 11. We are also informed that even though there was default in submitting the returns, the accounts of the company have been audited by the company. 12. So far as the present writ petition is concerned, the petitioners have assailed the notices dated 6th September, 2017 and 12th September, 2017 wherein their names appear at Page No.277 at Serial Nos.59193, 59194, 59195 & 59196 in the List of Directors who have been disqualified by the respondents under the provisions of Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 as directors of companies with effect from 01.11.2016. 13. Ld. counsel for the petitioners makes an unequivocal statement on instruction of the petitioners, that the pe....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI