2018 (1) TMI 769

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s.Aishwarya Rajyashree, Adv., Mr.Somnath Ganguli, Ms.Manasi Mukherjee, Advs., for the respondent ORDER The Court : Party/parties are represented in the order of their name/names as printed above in the cause title. Mr.Raghavan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner/assessee, submits as follows : (a) By an order dated 15th December, 2005 of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata - I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ter went back to the Commissioner for fresh consideration in the light of the observations made in the solemn order. (d) The petitioner made exhaustive written and oral submissions before the Commissioner/Respondent No.1 to demonstrate that there were no reasons to believe that the credit of duty availed of/utilised by the petitioner/assessee for the respective transactional years 1999 to 2005 (s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oneous perception of the availment of credit beyond the outer limit by the petitioner/assessee, directed a special audit of the assessee by a coequal functionary namely, the Commissioner (Audit- I Commissionerate). (g) On the first finding of the Respondent No.1, Mr.Raghavan does not raise any dispute at this stage. (h) On the second finding, Mr.Raghavan points out that the order of the Commissi....