Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 789

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....adeep Nandrajog, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. 2. A short issue arises for consideration: whether statutory authorities are governed by the principle of comity. 3. The principle of comity is well recognized in law, whereunder different statutory authorities and courts give due respect to the opinion rendered by each other. Only when the decision or an opinion of a Court o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n before the Registrar of Trademarks when respondent sought registration of the mark and the wrapper as its proprietary property, the opposition by the appellant succeeded with the Registrar of Trademarks turning down the application filed by the respondent vide order dated 13.9.1988. 7. In proceedings before the Copyright Board under Section 50 of the Copyright Act the appellant has failed. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is that while dealing with the question of infringement of copyright of an artistic work, the Court is to test on the visual appearance of the object and drawing; design of the artistic work in question and by applying the test viz. "the lay observer test" whether to persons who are not experts in relation to objects of that description, the object appears to be a reproduction. If to the lay obse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and is a manufacturer of a well known soap, it cannot be permitted to claim a monopoly of two labels with a red background and words in white colour. We are convinced that the petitioner has miserably failed to establish its case of piracy of label by the respondent. In the result the petition deserves to be dismissed. Since the respondent has not appeared we do not think it proper to saddle the p....