Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... investigations were conducted by the officers on the ground that the main appellant manufactured and cleared watches with MRP of above Rs. 500/- per piece and availed ineligible SSI examination in terms of Notification No.8/2003-CE-dated 01.03.2003 read with 8/2006-CE-dated 01.03.2006. On completion of enquiries, proceedings were initiated against the main appellant and two Directors of the main appellant, to demand and recover central excise duty and also to impose penalties on them. 2. The case was adjudicated by the original authority vide his order dated 26.12.2010. He confirmed the excise duty liability of Rs. 27,19,427/- and imposed equal amount of penalty on the main appellant in terms of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 194....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... recovery of Kaccha slips showing unaccounted sale of wrist watches and recovery of price tags of various models with MRP of above Rs. 500/- per piece. The private documents as well as prices tags were corroborated by the statements given by the persons concerned with affairs of the main appellant. We note that the claim of the appellant that there is no corroborative evidence on unaccounted clearances of dutiable items is not tenable. Two Directors of the main appellant have categorically stated that the main appellant was engaged in the manufacture of watches and they did clear that with MRP of more than Rs. 500/- per piece. When asked about the details regarding raw material procurement, sale particulars and buyers details, the same coul....