Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under tariff heading 9101 or 9102. Certain investigations were conducted by the officers on the ground that the main appellant manufactured and cleared watches with MRP of above Rs. 500/- per piece and availed ineligible SSI examination in terms of Notification No.8/2003-CE-dated 01.03.2003 read with 8/2006-CE-dated 01.03.2006. On completion of enquiries, proceedings were initiated against the main appellant and two Directors of the main appellant, to demand and recover central excise duty and also to impose penalties on them. 2. The case was adjudicated by the original authority vide his order dated 26.12.2010. He confirmed the excise duty liability of Rs. 27,19,427/- and imposed equal amount of penalty on the main appellant in terms o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant has been sustained by the Revenue based on recovery of Kaccha slips showing unaccounted sale of wrist watches and recovery of price tags of various models with MRP of above Rs. 500/- per piece. The private documents as well as prices tags were corroborated by the statements given by the persons concerned with affairs of the main appellant. We note that the claim of the appellant that there is no corroborative evidence on unaccounted clearances of dutiable items is not tenable. Two Directors of the main appellant have categorically stated that the main appellant was engaged in the manufacture of watches and they did clear that with MRP of more than Rs. 500/- per piece. When asked about the details regarding raw material procurement, s....