2017 (2) TMI 1294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. Shri R.K. Sharma, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Devender Singh, Member (T)]. - The appellants are in appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 1000/CE/CHD/06, dated 24-10-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh. 2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Proview Electronics Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 1,28,720/- along with interest and proposing equivalent penalty under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The demand was confirmed along with interest and equivalent amount of penalty by the Assistant Commissioner. The party went in appeal. In appeal, the order of Adjudicating Authority was upheld except for the penalty which was reduced to Rs. 1000/-. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cates contemplated by conditions in clauses (a) and (b) of column (4) of the table were issued on 14-12-2001. The name of the present appellant was mentioned as the supplying agency. It is also not disputed that the certificate was produced at the time of the clearance of the goods as prescribed in the said Notification and goods manufactured by the appellants were removed and supplies were made b....