2017 (5) TMI 1511
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eal filed by assessee against the order of Ld. CIT (A), Jalandhar, dated 25.04.2014 for Asst. Year 2005-06. 2. The assessee has taken various grounds of appeal, however the crux of grounds of appeal is the action of Ld. CIT(A) by which he has confirmed disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act for making interest free advance to various persons. 3. The brief facts as noted in the as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to examine whether there is any trading transaction between these parties. If there is trading transaction between the parties, the advance to be treated as trade advance made on account of commercial expediency and such notional interest cannot be treated as income of the assessee. In view of the above, the issue is set aside to the file of the CIT(A) with the above direction. The CIT(A) is also....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o which interest free advances were given whereas the Assessing Officer had examined 14 parties which is against the directions of Hon'ble ITAT. Therefore, it was prayed that only10 parties involved in the original assessment order should have been considered. 6. The Ld. AR submitted that in respect of 4 parties, the balances were outstanding from the earlier year and therefore, the additio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lhotra Book Depot Vs. ACIT (2016 61 I.T. Reps 585 - ITA No. 125 & 196/Asr/2015 (III) CIT Vs. Satish Bala Malhotra & Ors. (2016) 387 ITR 403 (P&H) (IV) CIT Vs. Max India Ltd (No.2) (2016) 388 ITR 81 (P&H)" 7. The Ld. DR, on the other hand heavily placed his reliance on the orders of authorities below. 8. We have heard the rival parties and have gone through the material placed on record....
TaxTMI