Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (1) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... deemed as profit under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1987-88?" The matter arises under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). The brief facts necessary for the decision of this case are as follows: The respondent-assessee is a partnership firm carrying on business in the export of marine products. During the course of the assessment for the year 1987-88 the relevant accounting period ended on December 31,1986, the Assessing Officer noted that in the balance-sheet of the firm as on December 31, 1986, there was a provision of Rs. 27,01,111 towards purchase tax liability. The Assessing Officer also found that out of the total provision of Rs. 27,01,111, Rs.17,89,732 had already been taxed in the earli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....86] 63 STC 239, there is a cessation of the purchase tax liability during the previous year relevant to the assessment year in question and, consequently, the said amount was rightly treated as deemed income of the assessee in the assessment for the year 1987-88. Senior counsel further submitted that the Tribunal has wrongly cast the burden on the Revenue to establish that there is cessation of liability during the previous year relevant to the assessment year in question. Senior counsel alternatively submitted that at any rate, when the Tribunal felt that there is no material on record to show that there is cessation of the purchase tax liability during the previous year relevant to the assessment year in question, the Tribunal should have....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y granting exemption claimed under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act the position would be clear that there is cessation of purchase tax liability at least in the assessment stage. The assessee has taken the stand that the assessment for the relevant assessment year is pending before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal, in the absence of any contra material, has acted on that basis and held that the Department has not established that there is cessation of purchase tax liability during the previous year relevant to the assessment year warranting invocation of section 41(1) of the Act. As already noted, the decision of the Supreme Court in Sterling Foods' case [1986] 63 STC 239 deals only on the question regarding the identity of ....