Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 1115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e following grounds before us :- "l. For that purported addition of Rs. 12,63,838.00 as an undisclosed income of appellant in unjust since there has been deposits and withdrawals in said S.B.I. A/c. Even there had been more withdrawals than deposits. Hence no addition is sustainable. 2. For that the addition of entire amount as undisclosed is unjust since the said A/c was joint in nature and appellant's wife was income tax assessee having same commission income from G.T.F.S. like appellant. So entire amount can not be of appellant's only. 3. For that source of said add back amount was the past savings of both of appellant and his wife accumulated from their commission income. 4. For that estimated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2006-07. The ld AO also came to know that the assessee was having a separate bank account with SBI Nabadwip Branch vide Account Number 01150060231 in the joint names of himself and his wife Monika Debnath. The ld AO collected the said bank statement from SBI u/s 133(6) of the Act and found that the following credits were reflected in the said bank statement :- Sl.No. Date of Credit Amount 1 12.04.2006 22,045/- 2 12.04.2006 10,587/- 3 10.05.2006 28,049/- 4 13.06.2006 44,655/- 5 28.06.2006 26,806/- 6 06.07.2006 66.89/- 7 27.07.2006 2,00,000/- 8 17.08.2006 54,782/- 9 11.09.2006 31,717/- 10 12.09.2006 15,000/- 11 20.09.2006 29,539/- 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AO further observed that though the assessee had debited various expenses in his income and expenditure account and claimed the same as deduction, the same were supported only by self made vouchers and no supporting evidences were submitted by the assessee. Accordingly he estimated the allowability of expenses @ 50% of gross commission received by placing reliance on the Circular No. 553 dated 15.5.1991, 648 dated 30.3.1993 and 677 dated 28.1.1994. Accordingly, he disallowed a sum of Rs. 4,37,461/- in the assessment. 6. The ld AO by making the aforesaid addition / disallowance, determined the total income of the assessee as under:- Gross Commission received 8,74,922   Less: Deduction allowed as above 4,37,461 &nbs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ughout the year together with its mode of receipt for both assessee as well as his wife. From the same, it is glaring on us that on the same day, two cheques were issued by GTFS independently for assessee and another for his wife. Both these cheques were deposited in SBI. For example on 13.6.2006, the assessee has received Rs. 29,169/- and his wife has received Rs. 15,486/- and there is a single credit in SBI bank account on 13.6.2006 to the tune of Rs. 44,655/- ( 29169+15486). Similar is the case for other dates as prepared in the tabulation above. Moreover, we find that both the assessee as well as his wife had duly credited the gross commission received in the sums of Rs. 8,74,922/- and Rs. 12,19,911/- in their respective income and expe....