1992 (1) TMI 350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut of two suits for permanent injunction based on possession claimed by the plaintiff in each suit. In O.S.No. 239/49 the plaintiff was S.N. Vadiyar while he was the defendant in O.S. No. 315/73 filed by Ramaswami Ayyar. The said R. Ayyar was the defendant in O.S. No.239/69. Both these suits related to different parcels of agricultural land of which the plaintiff claimed to be in possession and on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court in favour of S.N. Vadiyar could not have been disturbed by the High Court in second appeal. Alternatively, learned Counsel contended that even if it was permissible to do so, the High Court erred in re-appreciation of evidence and, therefore, interference with the finding recorded by the First Appellate Court is unjustified. We are unable to accept....