Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 1282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the sale deed is to be taken as cost of acquisition when the actual consideration paid is Rs. 46,00,000/= (Rupees Forty Six Lakhs only) in terms of the earlier agreement of sale for the purpose of computing capital gains for the Assessment Year 2007-2008? ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Honourable Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in taking into consideration only the apparent consideration stated in the sale deed and not the actual consideration paid by the appellant assessee to the vendors for purchasing the property for the purpose of computing capital gains for the assessment year 2007-2008? iii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Honourable ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IT(A) applied the principle contained in section 50C of the Act that enabled the assessing officer to substitute the guideline value in place of the consideration adopted by the parties in the computation of capital gain. Since the assessee had paid the stamp duty on the differential cost computed by the registering authority on the basis of guideline value of the property, the CIT(A) was of the view that the consideration relatable to the stamp duty paid was liable to be adopted as the deemed cost of acquisition. The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which, after hearing the counsel on behalf of the Revenue, the assessee not being represented, restored the order of assessment, only modifying the same to stat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mination, after taking into account all relevant factors, to arrive at the actual/real consideration. In the present case, we find that the Tribunal, the final fact finding authority, has proceeded on the notion that the consideration, as reflected in the deed of sale, is the only parameter to be taken into consideration. While we agree that this would be one important factor, there are other parameters to be looked into before determining the actual consideration paid. 7. The Tribunal notes, in para 7 that additional stamp duty has been paid by the appellant at the time of registration. However, the tribunal declines to substitute the sale value as per the registered sale deed, being Rs,25,52,,820/- with the amount stated to be paid by ....