2017 (12) TMI 582
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eevesh For The Respondents : Sri.K.M.V.Pandalai, Income Tax Department JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.25786 of 2017 is the appellant. In the writ petition, he challenged Ext.P7, an order passed by the first respondent granting stay of recovery of the tax due from the appellant subject to his remitting 50% thereof in six equal monthly instalments. In the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....appellant over telephone on 03.07.2017 and that when all these attempts fail, the appellate authority proceeded to pass Ext.P7 order. Prima facie, therefore, this order shows that this is not a case where opportunity was denied to the appellant, but it is a case where opportunity extended was not availed of by the appellant. In such a situation, we do not find any illegality in the judgment for in....