Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellants Shri Ubhav Sangraj, AR for the Respondent ORDER Per Anil Choudhary: The issue in this appeal is whether the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is justified in retaining penalty of Rs. 30,900/- imposed on the appellant co-operative society for breach of the provisions of Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) have recorded the following find....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that stock position of the bidis as on 31.01.2014 are 180,92,080 (nos.). The appellant has explained that out of 180,92,080 (nos.), 111,00,550 (nos.) are chatt bidis and 69,91,530 (nos.) are good quality bidis except 18,75,000 (nos.) which was stored separately in the godown. It is observed that the appellant have not followed the procedure laid down under rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ded in the statutory record, the clandestine removal of the same is a non-possibility. As such by taking into account the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I hold that the goods in question is not liable to confiscation. iv) Though the same might be on account of constraint of space in the factory premises but fact remains that such storing of the goods nearby to the factory premises ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cumstances, that when the finished goods of defective biris or sub-standard biris which were stored in adjoining premises outside the factory premises were duly accounted for in the RG1 register, and no evidence of clandestine removal being there, have held that only a case of venial breach of the provisions of Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 is made out, Rule 4(4) provides that an assesse....