Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (1) TMI 21

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Barve, for the appellant. He informs that the defects as pointed out by the office has already been cured. Heard on admission. This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, against the order dated January 24, 2003, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, in I.T.A. No. 157/Ind. of 1997, for the assessment year 1994-95.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee was not aware of this. It was further submitted that all basic information was furnished and the assessee had made full disclosure, therefore, penalty cannot be levied. The Assessing Officer did not find favour with these contentions and penalty amounting to Rs. 3,10,557 was imposed. On appeal being preferred by the assessee against the said order of the Assessing Officer, learned Com....