Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 267

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R.) for the Respondent ORDER The appellant though availed Cenvat credit in respect of Bagassee Bailing Machine which is used for bailing of loose baggase during the course of manufacture. Part of the baggase is used in the course of manufacture of final product which is cleared on payment of duty. Audit party has raised objection and appellant have admittedly paid the duty interest and 25% penal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mmissioner examined refund on merit and held that Cenvat credit is not admissible on the bailing machine on the ground that the same is used for baggase which is exempted. Being aggrieved by the impugned order appellant is before me. 2. Shri. V.B. Gaikwad, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the rejection of refund on the merit that whether the bailing machine ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....only for exempted goods, the said machine is used for bailing of baggase which partly used in the factory of the appellant as fuel therefore bailing machine is not used exclusively for the manufacture of exempted goods. 3. On the other hand, Shri. H.M. Dixit, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that once the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d this findings therefore it is attained finality. Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) further proceeded on admissibility of the Cenvat credit on the bailing machine. It is observed that the said issue was not raised in the show cause notice therefore Ld. Commissioner(Appeals) travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice for this reason itself order is not sustainable. Even on the issue of admissibil....