2017 (12) TMI 235

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp; Mr. K. Poddar, D.R.  ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 06.04.2017 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Meerut. 2. The appellant is a service provider under the taxable category of manpower recruitment and supply agency service. In respect of the taxable services provided during the period 2004-06, the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t submits that as per the requirement of Section 73 ibid, show cause notice was required to be issued within the stipulated time frame of 1/5 years from the relevant date. Thus, he submits that since the show cause notice was issued after a lapse of more than 6 years from the date of payment of Service Tax by the appellant, the same is not maintainable and accordingly, the adjudged demand confirme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed order and further submits that since interest is compensatory in character and the same is payable in the case of delay in payment of the principal amount i.e. Service Tax, interest liability is automatic and there was no requirement of issuance of any show cause notice for recovery of the said amount. Thus, he submits that the time limit prescribed in Section 73 ibid will not have any applicat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ars from the relevant date. No such recovery provisions exist separately in the Service Tax statute, in context with the demand of interest amount for delayed payment of Service Tax. 8. I find that while endorsing the views of the Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. T.V.S. Whirpool - 2000 (119) ELT A 177 (S.C.) have ruled that "it is only reasonable that the period of limita....