Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (10) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....substantial question of law was framed for consideration of this appeal: "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the mistake pointed out by the Assessing Officer for invoking jurisdiction under section 154 of the Income-tax Act can be considered as a mistake apparent from the record, which could confer jurisdiction to the Assessing Officer for initiating and making orders under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the purpose of recomputing allowable deduction under section 80-I?" The above question relates to the rectification in the original assessment order in computing the deductions permissible under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act"), for the assessment year 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....consonance with section 80A(2) read with section 80A(4) of the Act. The Assessing Officer has sought to compute the income of the new undertaking for the purpose of computing deductions permissible under that section by setting off the loss carried forward from the assessment year 1983-84 by treating the new undertaking as the only source of income against which such losses carried forward could be set off. It is on this premise that deduction under section 80-I was recomputed by reducing the profit of the new industrial undertaking by setting off the carried forward losses of the year 1983-84 and on the reduced amount, the deductions under section 80-I was computed. The assessee has urged that there was no carry forward of losses of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re arriving at the income from the priority industry for the purpose of calculating allowability of deductions under section 80-I, the unabsorbed depreciation or unabsorbed development rebate of the said new industrial undertaking which was carried forward in the previous year was required to be adjusted. However, this principle has no application where there is no carry forward of the previous year losses seeking adjustment against the income of the current year. Thus, the finding that there was no mistake in the original assessment which needed to be rectified, the rectification for recomputation of the allowability of the deductions under section 80-I was set aside. On further appeal, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tr....