2005 (7) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. ORDER Petitioner is carrying on business in garments exporting pursuant to a policy of the respondent known as 'Garment Export Entitlement Policy'. Certain quotas were allotted to the petitioner and as par th6 quota allotted to the petitioner, petitioner has to utilize the said quota by exporting the Garments to or the foreign countries within the time stipulated. If the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed by the petitioner to quash the circular dated 27.10.2004 issued by the second respondent which is produced at Annexure-F as unconstitutional, arbitrary and illegal. Subsequently, the petitioner also filed an application requesting this court to permit him to amend the writ petition and to include the addItion21 prayer to direct the respondent to pay a sum of ₹ 97,95,230/- as damages s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....council submits that, the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that Annexure-F cannot be quashed at this length of time. It is not in dispute that, the quota which was allotted to the petitioner to ba, completed on or before 31.12.2004 and in view of the fact that said fact,Annexura-F cannot be quashed. Evan if the said Annexure is quashed, the petitioner cannot export the garm....