Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (5) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pur, on the application of the Controller of Estate Duty, Jodhpur, in R.A. No. 216/JP of 1997 (arising out of EDA No. 4/JP of 1993), under its order dated June 16, 1998, referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally justified in law in holding that levying of interes....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the assessment, charged interest under section 70(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (for short, "the Act, 1953"), on the ground that instalment was granted subject to payment of interest. The matter was carried in appeal to the Controller of Estate Duty (Appeals). On the point of this interest charged under section 70(1) of the Act, 1953, the appellate court confirmed the order of the Controller....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te duty. The authorised officer had levied interest under section 70(1) of the Act at the time of the original assessment and also in the setting aside proceedings. The learned Tribunal held relying on the decisions in the cases of Prem Nath Khan delwal v. Asst. CED [1970] 77 ITR 949 (Cal) and H.M. Jaffar v. Asst. CED [1980] 124 ITR 443 (Karn) held that in order to levy the interest under section ....