2017 (12) TMI 33

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) For the Respondent ORDER The facts of the case are that appellant had filed Bill of Entry No.767106 dt. 07.01.2009 for the clearance of certain used computer parts and components and declared the value as Rs. 63,77,851/-. As these goods were used computer parts and components, order for first check was given to examine the goods with the h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....were allowed to be re-exported on payment of fine of Rs. 7,50,000/- under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962.  Penalty of Rs. 3 lakhs was imposed under Section 112 ibid.  2.      Today when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellant, Ld. Advocate Shri M. Karthikeyan submits that goods that they were not aware of the fact that the goods were c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of the ld. Advocate that the goods have come without intimation and that Bill of Entry has not been filed by them, the fact remains that they have owned the import and also participated in subsequent proceedings before the customs authorities and the adjudicating authority.  It is also not disputed that they themselves submitted by their letter that the goods have been imported for test. Th....