2017 (12) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) ORDER The miscellaneous application is for rectification of error apparent on record in the Final Order No.42014/2017, dated 12.09.2017. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in the said final order, there is apparent error to the effect that the Tribunal proceeded on the incorrect u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ter hearing both sides in detail and there is no discernible error apparent on record. The appellant being aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal shall resort to statutory remedy available as per Finance Act, 1994. Once the order is passed after detailed consideration of facts and legal position, the Tribunal cannot entertain any adjudication to reappraise the evidences or legal position in ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant having followed the provisions of Rule 6(2) cannot follow the provisions of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The learned counsel submitted that they have not admitted of maintaining separate accounts for common input services under Rule 6(2). It is also submitted that the Revenue also never contended that they have maintained separate accounts under Rule 6(2) for common input serv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th reference to non-existence of provision for lapsing or reversal of credit, which was taken as per the provision of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, we note that we have already given a finding regarding ineligibility of the appellant to follow  both the provisions of Rule 6(2) and Rule 6(3) simultaneously in respect of input services. When the credit itself is not eligible because of this legal ....