Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (8) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce made under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to answer the following question of law: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessment made under section 143(3) read with section 143(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was barred by lim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rned counsel for the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal. None present for the assessee despite service. Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue and having perused the statement of the case and the relevant orders forming part of the case, we are of the opinion that the question referred has to be answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. It is not....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of calculating four years from that date. Four years period as prescribed under section 153(2) would thus expired on March 31, 1988. As taken note of supra, the assessment in question was completed on March 25, 1988, i.e., well within four years as per requirement of section 153(2) which had application to this case at the relevant time. These dates are taken by this court from the statement of ....