Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (11) TMI 1454

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- For the Appellant Shri Mandeep Sharan, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 30.09.2014 passed by the Commissioner (A) wherein the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that during the scrutiny of their returns in Form ER 3 for the period from March 2011 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....coverable along with interest in terms of Section 11A and 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944, respectively. It also appeared that they were liable for penalty under Section 11 AC (a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 3. The above facts culminated in the issuance of two show cause notices demanding excise duty along with interest and penalty viz SCN....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....untarily paid the duty of excise on the goods transferred to their own depot and had paid interest as well much before the issue of show cause notice. He further submitted that when duty along with interest is paid before the issue of show cause notice, the department should not have issued show cause notice at the first place and not to impose any penalty. He also submitted that there is no suppr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....return which is not disputed by the department. In support of his submission, he relied upon the following decisions: • CCE Vs. Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Ltd, 2012 (26) STR 3 (Kar.) • M.R. Coatings Pvt Ltd. Vs. CCE, 2013 (30) STR 76 (Tri-Ahmd) • Krishna Electrical Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE, 2013 (292) ELT 385 (Tri.-Del) 7. On the other hand, the Le....