Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (2) TMI 1529

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowing order is delivered by Justice Subhash Samvatsar, Chairperson, Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange: 2. This appeal is preferred against Adjudication Order No. ADJ/61/B/SDE/KNR/2007/FERA/4619 dated 30-10-2007 in case No. T4/82/B/SDE/PKA/98 passed by Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai where by the Director of Enforcement has imposed a penalty of a sum of ₹ 3,00,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....racted their statements. 4. On the basis of their statements a show cause notice was issued to the present appellant on 18-9-1999 alleging that the present appellant has purchased foreign exchange equivalent to ₹ 15,00,000/- from Mohamed Omar Mistry. The appellant in his reply to the said show cause notice denied the allegations of purchasing the foreign exchange from Mohamed Omar Mist....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant and therefore the findings arrived at by the Adjudicating Authority are perverse. 6. Ms. Sonali Bhade, ALA on the other hand supported the Impugned Judgment and contended that the statement of the present appellant is corroborated by Mohamed Omar Mistry and other evidence on record and therefore the Impugned Order deserves to be maintained. 7. After hearing the arguments of both th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Bhawar Lai Patel when present appellant is Bhawar Lal Jain. Apart from that difference .in the name shows that there is no identification of the appellant. No identification parade was conducted to establish the identity of the appellant. 9. More over the Supreme Court in case of Haricharan Gurmeet v. State of Bihar AIR 1964 SC 1184 has considered the effect of confessional statement mad....