Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (11) TMI 746

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eration in the instant case is, whether the petitioner can be treated as a first seller of tractors inside the State of Tamil Nadu. To decide this question, the following facts would be sufficient. 3. The petitioner is one of the authorised dealer of the manufacturer of Tractors M/s.Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, [ M&M Ltd. in short]. Its spares and accessories and a registered dealer on the file of the respondent, under the Provisions of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 [ TNGST in short]. M/s.M & M Ltd., has got a branch in chennai. The petitioner purchased one tractor from the M&M Ltd. and an invoice was raised for the tractor and the petitioner paid totally a sum of Rs. 12,64,350/- [Rupees Twelve Lakh Sixty Four Thousand and Thr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....only Entry Tax at 6% on the purchase of tractors. 7. Therefore, the respondent opined that collection of Entry Tax gives no right to the petitioner to state that they have paid tax under the TNGST Act at 4% and surcharge at 5% on the said 4%, in all, at 4.2%. This led to issuance of revision notice dated 10.07.2007 proposing to reject the monthly return and assess the turn over to the best of judgment. The assessment relates to the year 2005-2006. 8. The petitioner submitted their objections, reiterating their stand that they can never be treated as the first seller within the State and they being the dealer of the manufacturer had purchased the tractors on payment of TNGST which has been collected by the M&M Ltd., in excess of what is li....