Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (11) TMI 740

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee : "(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in making the addition of Rs. 3,71,000/- under Section 68 of the Act relating to 22 creditors whose amount was below Rs. 20000/- and who advance money to the appellant for purchasing silver ornaments ? (ii) Whether the appellant having discharge the onus by submitting the confirmatory letters with complete address of the creditors and the amount being below Rs. 20,000/- per creditor the ITAT was right in making addition on ground that no request for summoning any creditor was made by the appellant ? (iii) Whether section 40A (3) of the Act does not require the creditor to make expenditure in respect of the payment made in a day ot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is further noticed that to establish the genuineness of the aforesaid credit entries the confirmatory letters were brought on record to substantiate the genuineness of the said transactions. The assessing authority has noticed that the alleged confirmatory letters were having no proof with regard to the identification of the alleged creditors. He has further found that all the transactions were in cash. The assessing authority has therefore, doubted the genuineness of the transaction as the same were neither verifiable nor substantiated by the appellant. The assessing authority has further found that the credit worthiness of the alleged creditors was also remained un-established in absence of the genuineness of the persons who have credit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wholly imaginary and was without any substance or evidence as he failed to substantiate the genuineness of the cash credit as such has held to be unexplained and accordingly the aggregate amount which has been found/ noticed in the cash book under the heading of credit entries total sum of Rs. 3,71,000/- has been added to the income of the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the assessing authority the appellant has preferred an appeal before the CIT (Appeals) who vide its order dated 28.12.2011 has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant and has confirmed the order passed by the assessing authority. Still aggrieved by the order of CIT (Appeal) the appellant has preferred an appeal before the ITAT which has been dismissed vide imp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts of share application money, share capital, share premium or any such amount by whatever name called, any explanation offered by such assessee-company shall be deemed to be not satisfactory, unless- (a) the person, being a resident in whose name such credit is recorded in the books of such company also offers an explanation about the nature and source of such sum so credited; and (b) such explanation in the opinion of the Assessing Officer aforesaid has been found to be satisfactory: Provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply if the person, in whose name the sum referred to therein is recorded, is a venture capital fund or a venture capital company as referred to in clause 23(FB) of....