AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (11) TMI 235
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....RDER Per: Ramesh Nair The issue involved is that whether in terms of Rule 6(3)(b) the assessee is required to deduct 8% from the sale price of the exempted goods for payment of 8% or otherwise. 2. Shri Rajesh Ostwal, Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that on identical issue the Tribunal in their own case reported in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. - 2007 (211) ELT 481 decided the m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....disclosed. The demand is within the normal period. Since no suppression of fact on the part of the appellant, there was no malafide. The issue is limited to the method of calculation of payment of 8%. The appellant undisputedly paid the 8% but only after deduction of 8% considering the same as tax. Therefore the issue involved is of interpretation of valuation for the purpose of Rule 6(3)(b). The ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt of 8% the same is not liable to be deducted from the sale price of the exempted goods. In view of this Larger Bench decision, the issue is no longer res integra. 6. As regarding the submission of the ld. Counsel for keeping the matter in abeyance, in the light of their appeal being pending in the Hon'ble High Court, we find that firstly, there is no stay of the Tribunal's order. Moreover....