Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (11) TMI 56

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(1)(a)?" The respondent-assessee was constituted as a partnership firm on April 2, 1973. Initially, it comprised the following partners: (i) Shri Mukat Behari Lal   60 per cent. (ii) Shri Anil Mittal  40 per cent. On April 1, 1976, Shri Deepak Mittal was taken as a new partner and the ratio of profit sharing was modified as under: (i) Shri Mukat Behri Lal 1/3 (ii) Shir Anil Mittal    1/3 (iii) Shir Deepak Mittal   1/3 The constitution of the firm was again changed through a fresh deed of partnership executed on March 15, 1978, and Shri Rajinder Kumar, trustee of Smt. Nirdosh Mittal Family Trust and Shri Jai Parkash, trustee of Smt. Neeru Mittal Family Trust were taken as partners. The share a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....904 28,506 (iv)  Neeru Mittal Family     20%       22,602         75      22,677       Trust                                              (v)   Nirdosh Mittal Family   20%       22,602         50      22,652 Trust ---------------------------------------------....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome-tax had proposed cancellation of the registration granted to the firm on the ground of violation of the conditions of the partnership deed in the matter of allocation of shares among the partners, but ultimately did not cancel the registration and held that the Commissioner of Income-tax could not have directed the Income-tax Officer to change the share allocation among the partners without issuing notice under section 158 read with section 67 of the Act. Shri Rajesh Bindal, learned counsel for the Revenue, fairly stated that the notice issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax was confined to the proposed cancellation of registration on the ground of incorrect allocation of shares among the partners and that no notice was given to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... if there is a dispute about the previous year of the assessee, it is to be determined keeping in view the provisions of section 3 of the Income-tax Act. Again dispute about the status has also to be specifically dealt with. Firm is a status. There may be dispute whether the assessee is a firm or an association of persons or body of individuals. This has to be specifically determined. Not only this, the firm has been given certain concessions in the matter of taxation. For that purpose, it has to get itself registered with the Income-tax Department under section 185(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act after making an application under section 184. If the Income-tax Officer finds that the firm was genuine and entitled to registration then he will re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(1)(a) as not erroneous, the cause of action by him came to an end there. We have already pointed out above that the order under section 158 is altogether a separate order from the order passed under section 185(1)(a). The Commissioner of Income-tax did not assume jurisdiction nor did he issue any show-cause notice before modifying the order passed under section 158 read with section 187(1), proviso, and section 67 of the Income-tax Act. He has also not mentioned in his order as to how this order was erroneous inasmuch as it did not affect the tax liability of the firm. We are not inclined to agree with the learned Departmental Representative that section 292B will cure the situation. Section 292B will be available where an officer has val....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....defect or omission in such return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding if such return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding is in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the intent and purpose of this Act." A reading of the above reproduced provision makes it clear that a mistake, defect or omission in the return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding is not sufficient to invalidate an action taken by the competent authority, provided that such return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding is in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the provisions of the Act. To put it differently, section 292B can be relied upon for resisti....