2017 (11) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upsaran, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per : M.V.Ravindran These two appeals are filed by Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 97/2014-CE dated 19/06/2014 & Order-in-Appeal No.95/2014-CE dated 17.6.2014. 2.   None appeared for the respondent despite notice. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass and appeals were of 2014, the appeals are taken up for disposal even in the abse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;  Learned DR submits that the impugned orders are not sustainable as the eligibility to avail CENVAT credit on outward transportation is itself incorrect. It is his submission that having been debited the amount so disputed by the department, the respondent could not have availed suo moto credit and the debits made by him and the consequent interest paid is also correct and the first appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2008 is already settled in favour of the assessee and respondent herein in the case of ABB Ltd.: 2011 (23) ELT 97 (Kar.) by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. Respectfully following the said ratio, I find that eligibility to avail CENVAT credit having been settled in favour of the respondent herein, debits made by him were incorrect and availed the suo moto credit. The suo moto credit has been c....